![]() ![]() can you tell me more about the problems you see with planes? i am pretty much a total noob with gcode, but i am pretty good with 3D, python, PLCs, and robots. Interesting tidbit: as some FreeCAD contributor was discussing his homebrew 2D adaptive, the actual original developer of adaptive jumped on and offered help and insight.Īs farf asaMPCNC/Marlin/FreeCAD right this very moment, i think the most practical thing is to get the PP to add rapid speed feed to G0, as they get spat out ‘naked’ right now. of course then you might not like how they do the CAM side of things either the difference with closed source, is here you could dig into wherever the ''CAM state and events" actually resides, put in your own hooks, and write a better PP architecture (should you ever ne possessed to do so). That means that some more complex task you will have to spend much more efforts.Īll very true. So pp can just “hack” that stream - some commands can be dropped, some expanded like a macro - pp works as a filter. Guys from freecad decided that they can use just tree of objects passed to pp, where each object is just a command from their superset gcode. Secondary, developing pp is pretty comfortable task, pp core serve to you. So, firstly, it’s easy to write post processor that generates whatever you want (as example there is pp which generates dxf). Also there are a lot of current state objects - current section, tool, spindle speed, cycle, etc. ![]() ![]() Guys from autodesk took architecture when cam core issues events that describes entities in domain notion - onLinear, onRapid, onCircular, onCycle, etc. First part is an idea and designing architecture. ![]() Coding and testing are second and third part of developing sequence. You see, problem not only in how many coders and qa guys worked in Autodesk comparing to freecad team. It's extremely configurable and reliable, especially with industrial grade motion control cards like those that Mesa sells. If it doesn't work well, I'l try your suggestions. Am figuring out how to replace the Jessie kernel with a recent RT kernel and will then be set if the g-code in FreeCAD works well enough. > The linuxCNC config still isnt working since its at version 2. I like the looks of FreeCAD and am running it on a Debian 8.2 workstation with LinuxCNC. I can now > selectively start either LinuxCNC or Machinekit in a RIP. Of course the few guys coding the CAM side of FreeCAD in their spare time can’t truly compete with Autodesk, but i found it surprisingly usable. LinuxCNC is a viable replacement for even commercial grade equipment. On, at 22:26, sliptonic <> wrote: > Ive made some progress on my side-by-side configuration.![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |